 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
I was thinking this also. But without seeing both cars, hard |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
J-Mart on October 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 128 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
I might be alone but I would take that trade then sell the posted by bbug on October 28, 2009 at 09:02 PM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
to say. But maybe an option. I think VR4's have slightly higher resale values then comparable mileage/age/condition Z's. Why? I have no idea, I think its BS. If you look at all the comparisons from 90-95 of Z, VR4, rx-7 TT, Supra TT, the Z wins out in most if not every magazine test/comparison. But out of all of those, the Z has the lowest resale value? WTF...? All I can guess is rx-7 and supra are in F&F, VR4 is AWD? Z has....? Like I said, its BS. The Z is the better car on every level.
Jared
1994 Twin Turbo |
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
12:54:07 10/28/09
